WordPress WooCommerce Themes

Nano-biostimulants: nano-Si and nano-chelates in agro

Nano-biostimulants: how nano-silica and nano-chelates are changing the approach to plant nutrition

Classic micronutrients and chelates have long been the standard in foliar feeding, but their effectiveness is limited by a physical barrier – particle size and the speed of absorption through the leaf cuticle. The nanotechnological approach to biostimulants – nano-silicon (nSi) and nano-chelates of trace elements – solves this very problem due to the radically smaller particle size and larger specific surface area. For agronomists and technologists, this is not a question of abstract science, but of a concrete choice: does the difference in efficiency justify the difference in price.

What are nano-biostimulants?

Nano-biostimulants are preparations based on nanoparticles with a size of 1–100 nm, which, due to their small size, penetrate the cuticle and cell walls of plants more easily than traditional compounds. This group includes nano-silicon (nSi, nano-SiO₂), nano-chelates of iron, zinc, manganese and molybdenum, as well as certain nanoforms of copper and selenium.

The main difference from conventional microfertilizers and chelates is not the chemical composition of the active ingredient, but the physical form of its delivery. The smaller particle size provides a larger contact area with the plant surface and more efficient transport of the active ingredient through the phloem and apoplast.

Nano-silicon: mechanism of action against abiotic stress

Silicon has long been considered a conditionally essential element that strengthens cell walls. Studies of the nanoform reveal a broader mechanism of action. Nanosilicon increases the activity of antioxidant enzymes – superoxide dismutase, catalase and ascorbate peroxidase, which neutralize reactive oxygen species that accumulate during stress.

Under salt stress, nanosilica helps regulate the Na⁺/K⁺ balance in cells, reducing the toxic load of sodium. In studies on soybeans, treatment with nanosilica in soil reduced the Na⁺/K⁺ ratio by approximately 40% and reduced the accumulation of proline, a marker of osmotic stress, by approximately 35% compared to the control. Nanosilica also participates in the regulation of gibberellins and jasmonic acid, which helps the plant maintain membrane integrity during drought.

A separate area of ​​application is reducing the toxicity of heavy metals. In rice, nanosilicon reduces the accumulation of cadmium by inhibiting the transport genes responsible for the absorption of this metal by the roots.

Nano-chelates of trace elements: biofortification and efficacy

Nano-chelates of iron, zinc and manganese are used mainly for foliar feeding. According to comparative studies, nanoforms of micronutrients increase the efficiency of absorption by about 18% compared to conventional forms, while for macronutrients the difference reaches about 29%.

The practical effect of nano-chelates is recorded in several directions:

  • increasing chlorophyll content and overall metabolic activity of the plant;
  • improving the transport of iron, zinc and copper to the grain or fruit (biofortification);
  • reducing the accumulation of toxic elements — arsenic and cadmium — in edible parts of plants;
  • prolonged action due to slower leaching compared to conventional water-soluble salts.

In field studies on rice, nanochelated iron was used for grain biofortification, and treatment of stone crops with nanochelated iron increased the iron and calcium content in fruits and the proportion of soluble sugars. In Ukraine, studies on the partial replacement of NPK with nanochelates of trace elements were conducted, in particular, at the National University of Bioresources and Environmental Management using the example of wheat.

Checklist before introducing nano-biostimulants on the farm

  • A specific crop problem is identified: abiotic stress (drought, salinity) or micronutrient deficiency.
  • The compatibility of the drug with other components of the tank mix has been checked.
  • A trial application was carried out on a small area before scaling up to the entire field.
  • The concentration has been specified according to the culture and phase of development (according to the manufacturer or scientific sources).
  • The cost of the nano-drug is taken into account compared to the expected increase in yield or quality.
  • It is planned to record the result – a comparison of the experimental and control plots in terms of yield and quality indicators.

Limitations and open questions

Despite the promise, the field of nano-biostimulants remains young: most products entered the market due to empirical success rather than due to a deep understanding of the mechanisms of interaction of nanoparticles with plant physiology.

Questions remain open regarding optimal doses for specific crops, long-term effects on soil microbiota, and standardization of methods for producing nanoparticles with reproducible properties batch-to-batch.

FAQ

How is nano-silicon different from conventional silicon fertilizers?

  • The difference is in the particle size and, consequently, in the penetration rate and reactivity. The nano-sized form (1–100 nm) penetrates the leaf cuticle more efficiently than conventional soluble silicates.

Can nano-chelates be combined with traditional fertilizers?

  • In most field studies, nano-chelates were used as a supplement to the main mineral nutrition, rather than a complete replacement for NPK. It is worth checking the chemical compatibility of specific preparations before tank mixing.

How much more expensive are nano-biostimulants than traditional counterparts?

  • The cost is higher due to the more complex process of synthesizing nanoparticles, but lower application rates partially compensate for the difference in price per unit area.

Are nanoparticles safe for soil and the environment?

  • This is a subject of active research. Currently, data indicate lower levels of leaching and contamination compared to conventional fertilizers, but the long-term effects on soil microbiota are not fully understood.

Sources

  1. Fascinating aspects of nanosilicon enabled plant stress tolerance – A comprehensive review — ScienceDirect, 2024. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773111124000202
  2. Harnessing silicon nanoparticles and various forms of silicon for enhanced plant growth performance under salinity stress — Discover Nano, Springer, 2025. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s11671-025-04270-2
  3. Silicon Nano-Fertilizer-Enhanced Soybean Resilience and Yield Under Drought Stress — PMC, 2025. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11902048/
  4. Nanoparticles as catalysts of agricultural revolution: enhancing crop tolerance to abiotic stress — Frontiers in Plant Science, 2024. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2024.1510482/full
  5. Nano-chelates and their role in boosting the productivity of cereals and vegetable crops — Plant Science Today, 2026. https://horizonepublishing.com/journals/index.php/PST/article/view/11389
  6. Using Nanochelating Technology for Biofortification and Yield Increase in Rice — Scientific Reports, 2020. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-60189-x
  7. Recent Trends in Foliar Nanofertilizers: A Review — PMC, 2023. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10650792/
  8. Synthesis and characterization of nano-micronutrient fertilizer and its effect on nutrient availability and maize productivity in calcareous soils — PMC, 2024. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12267529/

Add comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked

Don't forget to share